Last Updated: Wed Oct 1 00:18:37 UTC 2008

Joint Strike Fighter
JSF

In 2002 in a surprise decision the then Defence Minister announced that the planned AIR 6000 flyoff to choose Australia's future fighter aircraft was to be effectively stopped, with the developmental Joint Strike Fighter declared to be the preferred aircraft type.

The Joint Strike Fighter shows every prospect of being exceptionally well suited to its primary design roles of battlefield strike and close air support of ground troops, but it is not designed to perform air superiority roles, unlike the larger F-22A, and is not well adapted to performing the long range strike role now filled by the F-111. There has been considerable adverse press associated with JSF cost overruns and project delays.

This website will post a selection of relevant articles, submissions and papers.


JSF Articles

Air Power Australia - March 2007 - Lockheed-Martin F-35 Lightning II  -  Assessing the Joint Strike Fighter
HeadsUp Newsletter - Issue 318 - HEADSUP SPECIAL - Is the JSF really good enough? analysing the ASPI paper
HeadsUp Newsletter - Issue 322 - HEADSUP SPECIAL - F/A-22As, JSFs and 21st Century air combat
Australian Financial Review - 12 February 2004 - An air force worth fighting for
Australian Financial Review - 1 July  2004 - Turbulence hits choice of Joint Strike Fighter
Kopp C., May  1998 - Replacing the RAAF F/A-18 Hornet Fighter, Strategic, Operational and Technical Issues -Submission to the Minister for Defence
Australian Aviation  - April/May 2002 - Lockheed-Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter -
Part 1 - A Cold War Anachronism? / Part 2 - Sizing up the Joint Strike Fighter
Australian Aviation  - August 2002 - Hedging the Bet-  JSF for the RAAF?
Defence Today - September 2002 - The Joint Strike Fighter Decision
Australian Aviation  - April 2004 - Is the Joint Strike Fighter Right for Australia? Pt.1
Australian Aviation  - May 2004 - Is the Joint Strike Fighter Right for Australia? Pt.2
Australian Aviation  - November 2004 -  JSF = Thunderchief II? (PDF) - ThunderChief.org
Goon P.A. -   ADA Defender - Winter 2005 - Affordability and the new air combat capability
Defence Today - September 2005 - Fighter Programs Face Uncertain Future

Regional Capability Analyses

Air Power Australia - January 2007 - Sukhoi Flankers - The Shifting Balance of Regional Air Power
Air Power Australia - January 2007 - Sukhoi Su-34 Fullback
Air Power Australia - December 2006 - Almaz S-300PT/PS/PMU-1/2, S-400 Triumf, S-400M Samoderzhets
Air Power Australia - December 2006 -  Antey S-300V and S-300VM
Air Power Australia - January 2007 - Regional Precision Guided Munitions

The Parliamentary Debate [Click for more ...]
Related Links [Click for more ...]
JSF Limitations - Click for more ...

JSF vs F-22A - Click for more ...
What would an F-22A Raptor look like in RAAF colours?



JSF Inadequacy as F-111 Replacement - Click for more...








The Joint Strike Fighter best compares in its roles and missions, sizing and relative capabilities to the Republic F-105D Thunderchief, the workhorse of the US bombing effort during the Vietnam conflict. What is remarkable is the extent to which a similar roles/missions requirement, defined almost four decades later, produced a combat aircraft of nearly identical size and weight.  Like the F-105, the JSF is not designed to be a top end air superiority fighter, but is designed with a robust self defence capability.


JSF vs F-105D Stations

F-105D thunderchief over Vietnam



Artwork, graphic design, layout and text © 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Carlo Kopp; Text © 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Peter Goon; All rights reserved.
Recommended browsers Mozilla/Firefox, Konqueror.
$Revision: 1.369 $
NLA Pandora Archive
Notices